Date: Friday, April 10th, 2015 12:29 pm (UTC)
kate_nepveu: sleeping cat carved in brown wood (0)
From: [personal profile] kate_nepveu
Original anon says certain victims were reassured that "certain aspects of their stories" would not be mentioned, "So the report reads oddly shaped in some aspects." That's what I was responding to, and therefore by definition those references were _not_ made in the report and were _not_ documented. I don't dispute that certain allegations specified in my second paragraph happened, but question whether they were properly categorized as abuse or harassment.

And (a) the Appendices, which include the citations and references, were the part I originally read as I said in my post ("I just looked at the Appendices") and (b) I have now read the entire report, as I say in an ETA to my post. So indeed, I agree with you that making comments that show you don't actually know what's in a document hurts the credibility of your comment.
From:
Anonymous (will be screened)
OpenID (will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of people who comment anonymously.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
91011 1213 14 15
16 1718192021 22
23 24 2526272829
3031     

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Tags