I may have been wrong--I'm not used to thinking of Truepenny by her RL name, after all, and so I may have misheard. [*] And I strongly doubt that the imputation of intent is correct--careless phrasing, no doubt, but that's why it caught my ear.
[*] I only know her RL name because Papersky was attempting to convince me that I didn't actually know her from elsewhere. It was perfectly logical of me to think so, I maintain, because how likely is it that there should be two women engaged in online communities who both started reading Lymond with book 4 and hated Dunnett as a result?
no subject
I may have been wrong--I'm not used to thinking of Truepenny by her RL name, after all, and so I may have misheard. [*] And I strongly doubt that the imputation of intent is correct--careless phrasing, no doubt, but that's why it caught my ear.
[*] I only know her RL name because Papersky was attempting to convince me that I didn't actually know her from elsewhere. It was perfectly logical of me to think so, I maintain, because how likely is it that there should be two women engaged in online communities who both started reading Lymond with book 4 and hated Dunnett as a result?