![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
WorldCon: Re-reading panel followup
skwidly posted notes and asks whether the room being overwhelmingly female indicated a gender disparity in re-reading behaviors. I have absolutely no idea whatsoever. What do you all think?
(I'm feeling better, though still pretty wobbly, especially after my marathon day, and have given up on the idea of posting notes about my own panels. Fortunately skwidly or an audio recorder was at all the rest of them (err, well, maybe not the LibraryThing/Good Reads one; did I mention wobbly?) and I can rely on other people! I do have notes from a bunch of other panels that I will post at some point. Now I'm debating between a relaxing bath, a nap, or a trip to IGA to get more drinkable fluids. (The nap is winning.))
no subject
no subject
After I re-read your comment...
I have four younger sisters whom all read but do not seem to re-read much.
I've had both male and female friends comment in wonder that I would want to re-read books.
As to the panel, I would think there might be to many variables. For instance what other topics were available at the same time? Who was on those panels and what time were they and your panel scheduled.
As far as my re-reading habits. I'll re-read favorite authors, either just because or because a new book is becoming available and I want to get in the mood for it.
And speaking of mood, sometimes I feel like reading a particular type of book and there is nothing of that type in the to be read pile. Here's where buying books pays off.
no subject
Also, I have a really good memory for fiction, so I always remember the end, which ruins it for me...
no subject
Re: After I re-read your comment...
Those are definitely types of re-reads I find myself doing, probably the most frequent kind.
no subject
But yes, as my time shrinks I re-read much less.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Re: After I re-read your comment...
Oddly, the one book which I both enjoy and seldom reread is Lord of the Rings. That's because I know it so well (I first read it at around age 12 or so, 40 years ago) that I remember it too well and I find that my "pre-memory" of it is too distracting, I now leave it around 10 years between rereading.
(Oh, BTW, I've found your blog from someone else's link which was from someone else -- you are lost in a maze of twisty links, all looking exactly alike -- and got distracted. I finally realised that you probably don't know me and so thought I'd better say hi!)
Re: After I re-read your comment...
http://www.tor.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=blog&id=13692