ext_100935 ([identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] kate_nepveu 2009-08-12 01:26 pm (UTC)

While that all sounds admirably high-minded, Katheryn Cramer, due to some truly noxious behavior about a half a year ago, does not deserve defending (http://coffeeandink.livejournal.com/901816.html). It's not just disagreement.

Also, no, wanting to air differences is not the sole jurisdiction of the venerable.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org