kate_nepveu: sleeping cat carved in brown wood (Default)
[personal profile] kate_nepveu
I saw this Thursday night (and am now in a car dealership waiting room). I pre-read the current text of the play as preparation: this is apparently the second revision, which means that at least one change I remembered from the HBO version may not be its fault--I don't have the intermediate text to compare. (If you read the oral history at Slate, it approaches a literal miracle that this part of the play was ever finished, so I'm not surprised that Kushner keeps tinkering with it.)

Notes first about staging and smaller bits in roughly chronological order, then bigger-picture comments.

I know the World's Oldest Bolshevik monologue is very thematic, but I still think it ought to be cut.

The original text has the monologue, and then we return to the end of Part One, with the Angel declaring herself--and adding Prior's furious, frightened response: "Go away." This was omitted from the HBO version, and may have been sourced in the intermediate revised text--it's also not in the most recent text that this performance was working from. Honestly, I miss it; I think there's an argument to be made for the continuity from Part One, but probably the technical difficulties of bringing the Angel out for just that bit are a convincing reason not to.

Instead we open with Louis bringing Joe back to his apartment. The staging is now wide open; Louis's apartment, for example, is not on a turntable with some walls but a door on the left side of the stage and a rug. (The stage is also notably deep.) Location shifts are done by dark-clothed people or just out in the open; there's one scene where Harper is getting dressed in her apartment yet interacting with Joe in Louis's apartment, with Louis asleep in the shared bed, and she literally drags them and their bed out onto the stage.

The Angel's visitation to Prior has been remixed, again I think in the intermediate version, to have Belize be an active part of the scene instead of standing on the side while Prior tells him about it. This works well for me. (I'd forgotten how incredibly uncomfortable the Angel noncon sexual experiences are. Ugh.)

The puppets in the Mormon Visitor Center are very well-done, very creepy.

After the second intermission:

You could tell it was live because there was a little prop error. There's a scene where Joe visits Roy in his hotel room, and Roy pulls out his IV in response to Joe's telling him about Louis. There was a little spot of red on Joe's shirt before his confession, and I couldn't figure out where it had come from, and then Roy pulled out the IV and they both ended up bloody, and I realized: the "blood" pack under Joe's shirt leaked a smidge. I'm sure they'd rather that didn't happen, of course, but it was kind of weirdly reassuring as a piped-to-movie-theaters viewer?

Joe is written in the text as occasionally becoming abruptly, frighteningly angry (here at Hannah when he's looking for Harper and she's trying to connect), but either this portrayal can't sell it or it's not a good characterization choice.

Roy's death scene follows Joe punching Louis and Louis flopping on his back and saying that he's just going to lie there and bleed. Louis stays on the floor throughout, Roy's hospital room rises from the floor at the front of the stage, and Prior's hospital bed quietly become visible at the far back of the stage. I'm . . . honestly not sure about this choice, it's just background scenery and doesn't do much for me.

After the second intermission:

Prior wrestles the Angel and huh, look, there's flying after all (I'm pretty sure -- it didn't look like they were being lifted by the Angel Shadows).

The Angel is generally very good; the Shadows do great work with the wings and her movement, and I liked her voice. The only thing that bugged me a bit was her cough, which was more like spitting up or gagging; it's textually meant to convey incredible unwellness, which it sure did, but I'm used to imagining it as the dry sharp bark that the textual notes describe. (I have no idea what the other two performances I saw did with it.)

The scene in Heaven works particularly well on stage, partly because I never remember to write down all the Angel mappings, and partly because the Angel does a very good job with the big speech. I remember thinking "wow, I don't remember this language being so beautiful, it's almost . . . Shakespearean?" and then I wondered if the actor's accent was slipping and my American weakness for a British accent was manifesting. Whatever, I liked it. (Prior's rejection has also been fleshed out from the original version, which is again an improvement.)

Prior's return to Earth was staged pretty cleverly: the ladder went into the near-front part of the stage that rose up from underneath, so he descended as it rose and ended up climbing down . . . to the same level.

Big picture comments:

I suspect strongly (not having the 1996 intermediate text, but having seen the HBO version that post-dates it) that the addition to this version is the change to the Roy-Joe post-death scene, in which Joe agonizingly admits that he was wrong, he is part of the world and not above it, and that he has repeatedly lied. I viewed this, as I would given my previous very strong feelings about the way Perestroika treats Joe, as giving Joe the potential for change. Yes, he still asks Harper to come back at the end of the play, but I see that as a misguided attempt to make amends. However, in talking with other people who've seen this version, that viewpoint is not universal, and so I freely admit that my own preferences may be coloring my view of the intent of the scene.

Speaking of problematic white dudes in the play . . . I HATE LOUIS SO MUCH. All through his hideously racist monologuing at Belize, I was mentally chanting at Belize to go, break free of the text and walk out, don't sit through all! this! (More on Belize in a moment.) And I'd forgotten that he fucking blames Prior for his own leaving, saying that Prior was "too much of a victim." Why are they still friends with him?! Where is his on-stage moment of understanding of what an asshole he's been? Nowhere. GAH.

Finally: there is a very fine line between Belize, the only black (also, non-white) character in the play being the play's moral center, and being a Magical Negro. And on rewatching, I'm not convinced that lampshading the fact that Belize is trapped in a world of white people, or that he has a life that doesn't revolve around Prior and that the characters don't care about, that he has to bring up himself, is sufficient. So I don't know if it was this particular portrayal that wasn't working of me, or just generalized discomfort with the role overall.

The text I have is copyright 2013, and if you haven't seen or read the play since then, I think the changes are worth checking out. What did you all think?

Date: Monday, July 31st, 2017 07:27 pm (UTC)
sovay: (Viktor & Mordecai)
From: [personal profile] sovay
The text I have is copyright 2013, and if you haven't seen or read the play since then, I think the changes are worth checking out.

Until you reviewed this latest production, I hadn't realized there had been recent revisions. I have an omnibus edition of the play © 1995, which is slightly different from the separately published versions I grew up with. Now I really want some kind of critical edition. I'll check out the oral history you linked.

Where is his on-stage moment of understanding of what an asshole he's been? Nowhere.

I have all sorts of feelings about Louis because he's the only Jewish character in the core cast (which I would call Prior, Belize, Louis, Joe, Harper, and Hannah; I think of Roy Cohn and Ethel Rosenberg as one remove out) and because he fails in exactly the way he's always been afraid he would and has to live with it and handles it very badly in pretty much all possible directions; he falls strongly for me into the category of sympathetic but staggering fuck-up and I understand why he and Prior are not (and will never be again) a couple at the end. I don't think he gets a single moment of understanding and acknowledgment: I think he knows some of what's wrong with him from the moment he runs out on Prior and the rest of which he is genuinely unconscious—which is a lot, hence the fact that most of his scenes involve him getting called on his bullshit—gets dawned on him over the rest of the play, not completely, because I think one of Louis' essential qualities is his tendency to think that being aware of his faults is as good as doing something about them, but salvageably. More Doylistically, I don't believe he's an authorial stand-in, but I do think he's the character closest to the place Kushner is writing from—I don't see how he couldn't be. Everyone in the play is standing in for something. I suppose the community he embodies must have found him authentic or there would have been pushback. Do you hate him in all forms (page, screen, stage) or particularly this incarnation?

Date: Tuesday, August 1st, 2017 05:25 am (UTC)
sovay: (Viktor & Mordecai)
From: [personal profile] sovay
I don't think I'd flagged him telling Prior that Prior was too much a victim before, for instance.

I would feel differently if I thought Louis either really believed it or really expected Prior to believe him. Louis knows what he did was unforgivable. He's just hoping someone will tell him it wasn't. And in the meantime he's flailing around for anything that will let him feel like less of a stupendous asshole for walking out and he isn't going to find it—and I think he even knows it—but that doesn't stop him from opening his mouth and throwing these half-assed rationalizations at the wall. It's not a good thing to say, but it doesn't register to me as a truth of their relationship, or even Louis' perception of it. I think we have very different ideas of Louis' redeemablity as a human being, though.

The copyright page says 1992, 1994, 1996, and 2013 for Perestroika. I too badly want a critical edition.

Well, from your mouth to Kushner's publisher's ears.

Date: Tuesday, August 1st, 2017 11:27 pm (UTC)
sovay: (Rotwang)
From: [personal profile] sovay
That is a much more generous and nuanced reading of Louis than the play has given me, personally, a reason to reach for!

That's part of the reason I asked about performance vs. page: I've never seen Angels in America staged and I know the difference the reading of a line can make. I also accept that that may not be the deciding factor here!
Edited Date: Tuesday, August 1st, 2017 11:28 pm (UTC)

Date: Tuesday, August 1st, 2017 11:36 pm (UTC)
sovay: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sovay
My opinion of him's been pretty consistent, whereas, say, Prior or Harper or Joe have spoken to me a little more or less depending on the production.


If the National Theater version ends up encoring in a way that makes sense for you to see, I'd love to know what you think!

I can certainly try. The production I've always wanted a time machine for is the London premiere in 1993, whose cast included Daniel Craig, Jason Isaacs, and Stephen Dillane.

(Glancing at bits of the HBO version looks very _weird_ right after, so . . . cluttered.)

I've never been sure how it worked, partly because I can't imagine these plays being realistically staged. [edit] Like, if Derek Jarman hadn't died, I'd have trusted him to film them. I have a lot of trouble imagining anything else.
Edited Date: Tuesday, August 1st, 2017 11:36 pm (UTC)

October 2017

1234 56 7
8910 1112 1314
15 1617 18 1920 21

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Page Summary