kate_nepveu: sleeping cat carved in brown wood (Default)
Kate ([personal profile] kate_nepveu) wrote2019-04-25 07:47 am
Entry tags:

Thursday morning links have a busy day ahead

Oral argument this afternoon, big dumb movie tonight, so just a few things:

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 13


+1 (thumbs-up, I see you, etc.)?

View Answers

+1
13 (100.0%)

castiron: cartoony sketch of owl (Default)

[personal profile] castiron 2019-04-27 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
The 1983 one with Sylvestra Le Touzel as Fanny Price is pretty good, certainly faithful to the book and the characters.

The 1999 version directed by Patricia Rozema... At some point I want to rewatch it and see whether being in the headspace of "this is a movie set in the same time as Mansfield Park, with characters of the same names and a similar plot, but is completely unrelated to Austen's story" makes it more bearable. Fanny's personality is totally wrong, and the whole tone of the movie is off. I did like Rozema's bringing West Indies slavery to the foreground, but I didn't buy the details.

The 2007 version with Billie Piper -- again, Fanny's personality was wrong. I found it truer to the book than the 1999 version, but overall it left me unimpressed.

Mansfield Park is difficult to put on screen. Fanny Price is not a modern heroine: she's reserved and self-effacing; she has a strong sense of her low place in the Mansfield family and no desire to resist her position or advance herself, so it's hard to make her understandable and sympathetic to a modern audience without changing her personality. Mary Crawford is much easier to portray! Fanny has a rich internal life with strong feelings and opinions, but she rarely explicitly expresses them; another challenge for filming. I've often thought that a Bollywood production would do MP justice, with the musical numbers to convey the interior thoughts and feelings.