kate_nepveu: sleeping cat carved in brown wood (Default)
Kate ([personal profile] kate_nepveu) wrote2004-08-24 06:59 pm
Entry tags:

Link Dump, More GMail

Forgot to dump these links in last night's post. Work has gotten even more interesting today, so this may be it for a while:

And we have even more Gmail invites. As Gmail for Troops has only claimed half of the invites I gave them a while ago, I'm throwing it out to you all. All comments are screened so that people may leave their e-mail addresses (standard deal: if you're not on my friends or friends-of list, it would be polite of you to say how you got here; and anonymous people with disposable addresses are cordially invited to bite me). I'll unscreen any non-e-mail-address comments. (Edit: okay, NOW they're screened. Sorry.)

I also forgot that it was just over a year ago that Chad brought home the best Emmy ever. I can imagine life without our dog—it lacks cleaning up dog vomit from the carpet, and walks in the rain, and expensive dog boarding, true, but it also lacks happy wiggly doggie when I come home from work, and that alone is such a mood-lifter that it's all worth it.

[identity profile] sloanesomething.livejournal.com 2004-08-24 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)
The Princess who Kicked Butt made me smile. A lot.

[identity profile] thomasyan.livejournal.com 2004-08-24 04:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Hm, Fafblog does seem pretty amusing. I'll have to think about adding fafblog to my LJ reading list.

[identity profile] angeyja.livejournal.com 2004-08-24 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Happy Anniversary, and thanks for the links.

[identity profile] montoya.livejournal.com 2004-08-24 05:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Thankfully, I appear not to use too many of their cliche words in my own reviews; if they'd put "kinda" on the list, I'd be sunk, though.

As for Opera, I read their thing comparing it to "Firebird" (http://tntluoma.com/beyond30/2003/08/opera_vs_mozilla), and while it was biased, it also convinced me that Opera is not not not what I want:


If I have counted correctly (there are so many I may have lost count!) there are 18 search options and 11 general options on the first screen, and 48 options on the second screen. Opera actually has another panel of options, large icons, which I didn’t even bother to show because they are mostly the same as the small ones... However, this shows clearly that Opera gives you more options than Mozilla.


"78 options spanning multiple screens, with more panels we won't even get into here" is not a selling point, thanks. And in fact, it gets at the problem I've had with Opera: Its UI is insanely cluttered and nothing behaves like you'd expect. (Double-clicking on random text, for instance, which is something I do as a little tic while I'm reading long passages, brings up pop-up menus in Opera, in defiance of every application ever, where double-clicking text selects a word.)

Combine an open-sourcey UI with a mediocre core engine (it's better than IE, standards-wise, but nowhere as good as Mozilla) and the fact that unlike every browser since the dawn of time, it costs money, and I'm just not seeing it.

[identity profile] montoya.livejournal.com 2004-08-24 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
The double-click thing happens on what I believe to be a stock install of Opera 7. It's possible I did something to enable it, but I can't imagine why I would have, as I only keep it around for testing purposes.

I can't live without mouse gestures, either, but Optimoz's mozgest plugin for Firefox works very well. It's the one plugin I install on all my computers. Image-toggling isn't something I've ever wanted -- toggling them off? So you don't see them at all?

[identity profile] turnberryknkn.livejournal.com 2004-08-25 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
(smile) Yay Emmy! :-)