Uh, it was one, three, and five as I recall, but that's based on a very hazy memory, and I'd have to go check to be sure (I'll try to remember to do so tonight).
Oh, and I forgot to say earlier, nice idea doing "most important" books rather than "best" or some such, since it comes at it from a different, and in some ways more interesting, slant (not to mention it's the only way that, say, The Eye of the World would get on such a list).
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 01:38 pm (UTC)Oh, and I forgot to say earlier, nice idea doing "most important" books rather than "best" or some such, since it comes at it from a different, and in some ways more interesting, slant (not to mention it's the only way that, say, The Eye of the World would get on such a list).
-Trent