Thank you for your comment. I respect Mixon's concern for confidentiality.
However, as the post was meant to stand alone and be a public document, things that could not be referenced publicly should not have silently shaped the framing/categorization/etc., if that's what you're saying happened, because it damages the credibility of the document.
(Also, if you comment again, please say "commenter from above" or something.)
no subject
Date: 2015-04-06 12:57 pm (UTC)However, as the post was meant to stand alone and be a public document, things that could not be referenced publicly should not have silently shaped the framing/categorization/etc., if that's what you're saying happened, because it damages the credibility of the document.
(Also, if you comment again, please say "commenter from above" or something.)