Original anon says certain victims were reassured that "certain aspects of their stories" would not be mentioned, "So the report reads oddly shaped in some aspects." That's what I was responding to, and therefore by definition those references were _not_ made in the report and were _not_ documented. I don't dispute that certain allegations specified in my second paragraph happened, but question whether they were properly categorized as abuse or harassment.
And (a) the Appendices, which include the citations and references, were the part I originally read as I said in my post ("I just looked at the Appendices") and (b) I have now read the entire report, as I say in an ETA to my post. So indeed, I agree with you that making comments that show you don't actually know what's in a document hurts the credibility of your comment.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2015-04-10 12:29 pm (UTC)And (a) the Appendices, which include the citations and references, were the part I originally read as I said in my post ("I just looked at the Appendices") and (b) I have now read the entire report, as I say in an ETA to my post. So indeed, I agree with you that making comments that show you don't actually know what's in a document hurts the credibility of your comment.