Week in Review
Sep. 7th, 2003 08:06 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Wednesday, our first full day back from vacation, we had the exterior house painting finished and more bookcases (the last, we don't have any more room) delivered. Work had been pretty quiet while I was away. Other than that, mostly everything else notable about the week was dog stuff.
We picked her up Wednesday morning and she was fine, very happy to see us; so happy, in fact, that she wiggled extravagantly, licked us both, and then peed on the floor. Whoops. Oddly, my first reaction was, "She's so small"—the friends we stayed with over the weekend had a Rhodesian Ridgeback, i.e., a dog bred to kill lions. It was over a hundred pounds and not at all wide, just very tall and long. Somehow my default for "dog" had become reset to "enormous," which Emmy is certainly not.
On Saturday, she rolled in some dead stuff (ah, dogs) and so we headed to a pet supply store to get dog shampoo. We had her nails clipped while we were there, and she met a number of dogs without freaking out too much, which was good. She was very patient through her bath; it probably helped that we have a detachable showerhead, which speeds the process. Once or twice she put her paws up on the bathtub edge, in a very "May I leave now, please?" manner, but didn't fuss when we put her back on all fours. She's such a good dog. We gave her a new toy afterward as a reward, and it took her a full twenty frantic minutes to rip the squeaker out.
Today she was sick in the afternoon, vomiting several times over a couple of hours. Her behavior was otherwise pretty much the same, so we think she just ate something in the yard that upset her stomach. We're fasting her (is that a proper verb use? I don't think so, but "starving" sounds so bad) until tomorrow to let her stomach settle, as recommended, and we'll see how she does.
[ Chad just gave her a new toy, as the pig-frisbee from the very first night home finally disintegrated in an unsafe way. It's a long fuzzy thing with a rattle inside, and she is just going to town on it, prancing all around shaking it to hear it rattle, pushing it on the floor with her nose, the whole nine yards. She's just absurdly cute. ]
[ETA: twenty minutes later, by my system clock, she's got the squeaker out from one end and has about half the stuffing pulled out. The rattle is down the other end and she seems to be having some trouble getting to it; we'll see how long that takes. Definitely talented in a very specific and useless way . . . ]
Oh, by the way: if a recipe for sauce calls for an egg yolk, do not use an whole egg because you misremembered the recipe. They're really not equivalent. This hard-won lesson is brought to you by our overly-sticky alfredo from Saturday night.
Entertainment this week: the DVD of The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. This was only the second time I'd seen it, and I can now definitively say: we hates it, the nasty tricksy movie, we HATES it. Every single element, with the exception of the emotional dynamics between Frodo, Sam, and Gollum (okay, and some pretty Aragorn-in-motion shots), is flawed in precisely the right way to drive me stark raving mad. I see that I got most of them in a Usenet post I made last December, so I won't repeat myself now, though I now have more multi-faceted objections to the Theoden thread.
Gah. I am hopeful that the third will be better, but I'm probably not going to do the marathon all-three thing, even if I wouldn't have to take off work, just because I don't want to be in a bad mood going into Return.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 05:21 pm (UTC)"We" in this case referring to Kate and the mouse in her pocket. I actually liked it better the second time around (despite moderately frequent interruptions), and could in clear conscience make arguments in favor of most of the things they changed. (Mostly of the form "books and film are different media, and require different methods.")
Except Sam's big speech. God, that sucked.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 05:48 pm (UTC)Once or twice she put her paws up on the bathtub edge, in a very "May I leave now, please?" manner, but didn't fuss when we put her back on all fours.
Mine do this too, with the most piteous looks on their face. Now if I can just get them to connect the gross stuff with the bath we'll be all set.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 05:53 pm (UTC)It's amazing how much nicer her fur feels when it's just been washed; I didn't realize how dirty it was, even before she rolled in the dead stuff.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 05:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 06:16 pm (UTC)Re: TTT, I read your UseNet post, and I just found myself nodding my head frantically. You summed up everything I disliked about it, and every reason why, while I will probably rent it on DVD (if only to see the deleted scenes), I am unlikely to buy this instalment. Though I did like Gollum. I thought he was very well done.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 08:02 pm (UTC)One of my old dogs had a sensitive stomach. Once I quit buying her toys and bones that she could disintegrate, she quit getting sick. I recommend a very hard purely rubberish toy - she liked that one, and couldn't swallow bits of it. Of course, yours is still new to you, and the vomiting might be completely normal.
Also, I make alfredo without eggs. Is that weird?
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 07:10 am (UTC)It's not weird to make alfredo without eggs. I'm sure if I left the yolk out the sauce would be fine, but last time I made it properly the sauce reheated really nicely, so I'm not going to mess with it.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 09:06 pm (UTC)Much hysterical laughter as MK rolls around on the floor. I've heard that before!
As far as substituting a whole egg for a yolk, it depends. In some baked stuff it wouldn't matter. But those whites can firm up pretty dramatically.
MKK
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 07:13 am (UTC)And really, we *don't* have any more room for bookcases. Honest. (At least not in this house . . . )
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 08:12 am (UTC)Not unless we add more rooms, at least. Though there is that one corner of the dining room...
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 08:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 09:26 pm (UTC)The changes to Faramir didn't bother me so much.
The movies fail to capture the mythic tones of the books. They try, in parts, but it's undermined by the effort to "humanize" the characters.
I haven't had any particular urge to watch TTT, though I watched FotR a few times. I'll probably get and watch the extended edition, mainly because I enjoyed the commentary tracks and extras on the first one a lot (in fact, I've never watched the extended edition with the main audio track).
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 07:15 am (UTC)The changes to Faramir didn't bother me so much.
The movies fail to capture the mythic tones of the books. They try, in parts, but it's undermined by the effort to "humanize" the characters.
You see, for me the two statements are part of the same objective.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 07:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 08:15 am (UTC)And, actually, the battles are pretty cool. If I want some fantasy swashbuckling, I can watch TTT, skipping the walky, talky parts. On the other hand, it's so incredibly disappointing to only be able to enjoy the battle scenes, when there was much more to enjoy in the book.
Incidentally, ignoring the book's Theoden entirely, I liked movie Theoden, in that watching the actor I felt as though I was seeing a living version of the aged Beowulf. Specifically, I loved his speech at his son's grave, and his speech as he put on his armor at Helm's Deep. It wasn't Theoden, per se, but it was spiffy.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 08:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 02:29 pm (UTC)Trent
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 09:51 am (UTC)I know, but "everyone" sounds so much more rhetorically satisfying than "everyone (who hasn't read the books at least ten times, starting from when they were 12 years old or so)"
Trent
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 11:22 am (UTC)Well, that, and my own bloody-mindedness, of course.
I liked the first and third books, but TTT was one hard slog of a read for me. Oddly enough, I think that the things those of you that have read it over and over again hated about the movie are the very things that make me like it.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 12:54 pm (UTC)I didn't like the movie as much as Fellowship, but then, the cinematic world wasn't new the second time around, which cuts the impact a little. I didn't think it was awful, though, and the changes that were made weren't to parts of the book that I particularly hold dear, so I'm not bothered by them.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 03:40 pm (UTC)As to TTT, I don't hate it, I in fact think it is a very good movie and has some truly amazing shit in it, but I do agree that I simply don't love it the way I did FOTR. FOTR had... a unity to it that the second movie couldn't retrieve, and TTT for all its coolness did strike a couple of false notes.
I think the difference here is that I think that lack of unity was unavoidable to a certain extent, and am waiting to see ROTK before judging "the middle child".
(Also, not being particularly wedded to the source, the only change that bothered me unduly was the lack of Ent-draughts, which I understand is reinstated in the extended version anyway. And I actually liked Sam's speech.)
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 05:44 pm (UTC)I understand the middle-movie syndrome, but I'm not sure that the things that bother me are attributable to that or could be redeemed in RotK. I would be very pleased to be wrong, of course. But I'm glad you liked it--muttering "hate it hate it hate it" isn't much fun.
Yes, the Ent-draughts are in the extended version.