Listening order for Shakespeare?
Oct. 4th, 2005 09:52 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
If I were planning to listen to full-cast recordings of all 38 of Shakespeare's plays, what order would you recommend I do it in? Chronological order, chronological order except with the histories in historical order, thematic, worst-to-best, something else?
If it matters, I've read Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Othello, and part of King Lear (the class hated it so much we talked our teacher out of finishing it); and seen one version or another of Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, A Midsummer Night's Dream, Much Ado About Nothing, and The Winter's Tale. And The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, Abridged. I think that's it.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 02:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 02:11 pm (UTC)Well, that is what happened to me, so maybe you should ignore me. :) And I was also listening to the Arkangel ones; I'd seen a review of them and gotten really excited about the project. I may have to try them again when my life calms down.
The main problem with chronological is that I've never liked the early plays nearly as much; they feel like such a slog to go through. Which makes
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 02:19 pm (UTC)Umm, sorry.
Yes, that might work too, depending on what I'm in the mood for. I don't have all of them yet, so this isn't an urgent concern.
I might also start with one I know pretty well, like _R&J_ (as much as I dislike Romeo and Juliet, having seen the good-bits version in _Shakespeare in Love_ fairly recently will help my memory) just to see how well listening to a stage play works. All kinds of possibilities . . .
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 02:23 pm (UTC)