Page Summary
sovay - (no subject)
selidor - (no subject)
- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
cofax7 - (no subject)
lnhammer - (no subject)
musesfool - (no subject)
thomasyan - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2013-11-07 05:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-07 05:33 am (UTC)First I'd heard of it, too. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1837709/
no subject
Date: 2013-11-09 04:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-07 05:56 am (UTC)(well, some good had to come out of the existence of this overly saccharine trailer...)
no subject
Date: 2013-11-07 12:01 pm (UTC)Heh. It's been a long long time since I read it, so I don't guarantee how well it holds up, but this trailer is remarkable for hitting the points people are most likely to remember and yet entirely failing to convey the feeling and giving exactly the wrong idea.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-07 02:17 pm (UTC)Laura Dickerson
no subject
Date: 2013-11-07 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-07 06:31 pm (UTC)Not... this. Argh.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-07 06:34 pm (UTC)I don't actually remember a thing about how it ends, just the beginning section and then the fact of all the 50-page sections introducing us to new character after new character. Perhaps I will re-read it.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-07 07:49 pm (UTC)Not a "No, just no." Just: "No."
It does not help that, of the four leads, only one and a half displays screen presence (Russell Crowe, are you phoning this in or something?), and from what I remember of the story, Jennifer Connelly's character has the least story to go with her.
---L.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-07 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-07 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-08 12:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-08 01:10 am (UTC)That would be extremely confusing!