![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Last one; I really hadn't meant to spend my night doing this.
Thieves Guilds and Other Criminal Societies
The Thieves Guild is a common staple in fantasy novels. Terry Pratchett's Discworld books parody it; Scott Lynch's The Lies of Locke Lamora critiques it; and Steven Brust's Taltos novels examine a more modern Mafia-style version. What's good, bad, interesting, boring, otherwise worth talking about when it comes to this idea?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 01:50 am (UTC)Now that I think about it, I suppose the criminal organization in that book might be closer to that of the Taltos books, but going to check almost certainly would lead to a re-read, and that way lies not getting done the other things I want to do with my weekend . . .
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 02:02 am (UTC)off to bed. v. sleepy.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 02:07 am (UTC)I loved the idea of thieves' guilds when I was a teen reader. They sounded dashing and daring, they were anti-establishment. Somehow the thieves just stole from icky people who really deserved being robbed, because they were good thieves.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 02:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 03:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 11:25 am (UTC)This was, of course, picked up by Gary Gygax when creating Dungeons and Dragons, which may be a major reason for the use of Thieves' Guilds in modern fantasy.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 12:52 pm (UTC)Anyway, I think there's a boring D&D way of doing it, which does indeed derive from Lankhmar, and Brust does it brilliantly, and so does Tim Powers in The Anubis Gates.
The thing most worth talking about would be why this thing that never really existed in the form it typically exists in fantasy novels, and certainly not in a medieval world, is so common as to be a cliche. Why did Leiber's little bit of invention and extrapolation from C.18 London to Lankhmar become this standard piece of fantasy furniture?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-05-28 09:33 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 02:52 pm (UTC)It makes no sense. It's trite. It's grade school D&D-esque.
If you want to tell me a thieves-guild story, show me something like the modern mafia, which is powerful and ruthless, works legal loopholes but exists mainly by exercising fear over the populace, and where the authorities really want to shut those bastards down, but just can't quite do it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Francois Villon in space may be an alternative to Robin Hood
Date: 2007-05-26 10:39 pm (UTC)In that sense a thieve's guild is a way of incluing an ongoing community that lacking such justification would be unrealistic - can't have one's established characters be all ad hoc and getting executed all the time. In that connection the guild structure to open Citizen of the Galaxy allows Heinlein to say something about the specific frozen society while maintaining a POV from the bottom. Thorby as youth can't interact much with a skilled guild.
Re: Francois Villon in space may be an alternative to Robin Hood
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-05-27 10:54 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Francois Villon in space may be an alternative to Robin Hood
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-27 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-27 04:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 05:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: